Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Seattle is \o/ and science fiction is ♥

  • Jun. 28th, 2009 at 4:45 PM
happy feet
Seattle was lovely. ♥ Though I must point out that nobody (online, offline, sideline) mentioned the steep streets! Miami is flat, flat, flat, so they took us a bit by surprise. Though I will say, there was a satisfied feeling of a job well done when we made various climbs. I've concluded that stairs beats hills both in the up and the down, and I think up actually beats down just for the sake of my shins. I can't imagine it, but I saw several women take on the hills in heels (not, I should add, the extreme heels I spot regularly here in Miami, but heels none the less), to which I can only say, "wow".

I was a teeny-tiny bit disappointed in the weather. They had a near record breaking sunny streak and I'd been looking forward to a good gloom, but that seems the sort of thing it's kind of rude to complain about. ;)

We did all the touristy things, our Frommer's guide clutched firmly in hand. (By the way? Frommer's rocks.) Seattle has tons of fun touristy things to do. But the thing that affected me the most, and in a way I didn't realize I even needed, was the Science Fiction Museum. It reminded me that I'm a fan! :D A dorky media fan more than a bookish fan (though I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of authors I had read), but a fan none the less.

Science fiction has taken some serious hits this past year. Some of it, in my opinion, has been well deserved (the painful but very, very necessary "Racefail '09" discussions), and some of it has been grossly disappointing (depressing reactions to female characters). But it left me with the feeling that science fiction was a rather nasty little playground with a few shiny objects to lure in the ignorant.

Visiting a place that celebrates all the things science fiction does well, reminded me that there are in fact things science fiction does well. :D I have always, always been attracted to the shiny optimism that human beings are going to make it, that there are tons of nifty new phenomena and worlds to explore, that there's always going to be something worth striving for. That's what I've always loved about science fiction, and that's something it's still able to offer.

It's not a perfect genre, obviously. It makes plenty of mistakes, some of them rather egregious. But when it gets it right, science fiction can hit a storytelling sweet spot in me no other genre can. I'd lost sight of that and I'm grateful to Seattle's Science Fiction Museum for reminding me. Thanks, Seattle! :)

Tags:

Comments

( 12 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]astridv wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 07:52 am (UTC)
Hey, you're back! Whee.

Seattle is great, isn't it? Did you do the tour of the Seattle Underground? It's where they explain how the stairs in the street came to be. I found it totally fascinating. They actually take you down there.

And I'm so happy for you that you found your sci-fi squee again. I was in Seattle for several days once, but somehow missed that museum.

By the way, would you be interested in betaing my meta piece about fandom's reactions to female characters? Once it's done, I mean... right now all I have is a folder with twenty different text files... but I might have something ready in the next few weeks, now that I finally have lots of vacation time. (obviously I'd totally understand if you'd rather not get back into that brainspace, I hasten to add. ^^)

Edited at 2009-06-29 07:54 am (UTC)
[info]horridporrid wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 08:28 pm (UTC)
We didn't get around to the underground tour, unfortunately. :( It was on our list, but our list was pretty long. I think the aquarium bumped the tour into the "next time" group.

By the way, would you be interested in betaing my meta piece about fandom's reactions to female characters?

I'd love to! :D I feel like I've figured out how to separate out my own love/reaction for things and the general fandom reaction. So think I'm in a good place for that right now. *knocks on wood* ;)
[info]astridv wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 11:21 am (UTC)
I feel like I've figured out how to separate out my own love/reaction for things and the general fandom reaction. So think I'm in a good place for that right now. *knocks on wood* ;)

Yeah, I'm in a much better place now, too. *knocks on wood like whoa* More mellow. I think I can think about it analytically now without letting it drag me down emotionally. It took me, like, six months to get to that place, what's with that?! Anyway, yay for emotional distance and healthy compartmentalizing. :)

(Also, blessed be the LJ killfile extension... that tiny little program served me so well! *pets it*)
[info]astridv wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 08:00 am (UTC)
I was a teeny-tiny bit disappointed in the weather. They had a near record breaking sunny streak and I'd been looking forward to a good gloom, but that seems the sort of thing it's kind of rude to complain about. ;)

That is so the opposite from me. When I go on vacation I'm looking forward to a good sunny streak and eye every little cloud with mistrust...
[info]horridporrid wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 08:32 pm (UTC)
Hee! I've always been a bit sun-averse, but I think this year we've spent in Miami has exasperated it some. So many beautiful sun-filled days... I missed my gloom! :D Of course, we've entered the rainy season now, so I'm getting my fill. And loving it. ;)
[info]rane_ab wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 05:44 pm (UTC)
Glad to hear you had a good time (in spite of the good weather ;o))! I am amused that you were thrown by the steep streets - I've never been to Seattle, obviously, but I do come from a village in which streets tend to go up and down a lot and have now moved to a very flat city. I find it kind of depressing (though it's certainly easier getting around by bike!). *g*
[info]horridporrid wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 08:40 pm (UTC)
There is a certain character to hills, isn't there? But yes, when first confronted by them, we were a bit... astounded. ;D
[info]muchabstracted wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 03:06 am (UTC)
I loved the Science Fiction Museum! *beams in its general direction*

The oral history room had such a good story about Nichelle Nichols -- it seems to be on youtube here, if you haven't seen it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_igTZlsTPvU.
[info]horridporrid wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:12 am (UTC)
Ooh, I didn't catch that story, so thanks for the youtube link. :) I did get the story about the kiss between Kirk and Uhura as told by Nichols. And I have to say, my respect for Shatner kind of skyrocketed because he worked so hard to make sure the actual kiss got through. (In general, I think he was an ass, but for this he used his ass-powers for good. So I give him props. *g*)

I could have spent the entire day in the oral history room, by the way. So many interesting stories! It's definitely a museum worthy of a revisit, especially with the Experience Music Project thrown in. :D
[info]muchabstracted wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:15 am (UTC)
That's so funny! I hadn't heard that one, and in fact got the impression that Shatner had been an ass on the subject, in that he had insisted on being the one to kiss her instead of Leonard Nimoy. But I'm glad to hear there was more to it than that. Assuming that story was correct, which of course I've been assuming because it entertains me that way.
[info]horridporrid wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Per Nichols, Shatner definitely insisted that if anyone was going to be kissing her it'd be him (Spock/Uhura was the original script). But she described it as "charming". That and his suggestion that they run through their lines together pre-shoot, something they'd never done before. She may have just been putting a gracious spin on it, but Nichols came across as amused and a bit flattered by Shatner's enthusiasm.

But what impressed me (and her) was when the suits got upset (or maybe it was the director getting nervous and calling in the suits?) and the kiss started becoming a big deal, Shatner kept insisting that the kiss stay in the script. And when Roddenberry suggested they film the scene both ways (one with the kiss, one without) and see how it came out in dailies, Shatner said okay but kept kissing Nichols. When he finally, at the director's insistence, did the scene without doing the kiss, he looked straight at the camera and crossed his eyes. Which meant there was no non-kiss scene to work with.

It's the kind of thing a cocky actor, used to getting his way, would do. But in this case, I'm glad Shatner was so pig-headed about doing things the way he wanted. :)
[info]muchabstracted wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 01:12 am (UTC)
Heh. That is pretty cool. "Using his powers of ass for good" is an excellent way to describe it.
( 12 comments — Leave a comment )